Divorce

Threats of Criminal Prosecution Can Constitute Duress in Texas Divorce Case

Published on: August 17, 2020 | by McClure Law Group

Divorce is usually fraught with emotion, but in some cases, a party may be pressured to the point of duress. Duress exists when there have been threats that prevent a person from exercising their own free will. Although it is not duress when a person threatens something they have a legal right to do, duress may exist if they exhort or make improper demands of another person. An agreement signed under duress may be void. In a recent Texas divorce case, a husband alleged he was under duress when he signed the marital home over to the wife.

The parties married in 1994. During the marriage, they purchased the home. They separated in March 2017. They agreed the wife would take the home and the husband would not have to pay child support, but they never memorialized the agreement. The husband testified he changed his mind after finding out his wife was unfaithful.

The husband moved out in March 2017. The wife also filed her divorce petition that month. She testified that the husband came to the house in April, kicked in the door, and threatened to kill her, her boyfriend, and her grandmother. She reported the incident to the police.

Texas Appeals Court Affirms Divorce on Grounds of Adultery

Published on: July 20, 2020 | by McClure Law Group

The court in a Texas divorce case may grant a divorce in favor of one party if it finds the other party committed adultery. There must be “clear and positive” evidence of adultery. Adultery may occur after separation. In a recent case, a husband challenged the divorce on the grounds of adultery.

The wife petitioned for divorce on the grounds of insupportability and adultery, and cruelty. She requested a disproportionate share of the community estate. The trial court found the husband committed adultery. It named the parents joint managing conservators, with the wife having the exclusive right to designate primary residence. The possession order granted the husband access to the children on the first, third, and fifth weekends, but only from 10 a.m. on Saturday to 6 p.m. on Sunday.

The trial court denied the husband’s motion to reconsider, modify, correct, or reform its judgment and entered a final decree. The husband appealed, arguing the trial court abused its discretion in granting the divorce based on a finding of adultery and that the court abused its discretion in “materially deviating” from the Standard Possession Order.

Texas Divorce Court May Clarify Divorce Decree That Omitted Amount of Wife’s Retirement Award

Published on: July 13, 2020 | by McClure Law Group

In some Texas divorce cases, the parties are able to reach an agreement on property division. Such an agreement is treated as a contract, even when it is incorporated into a final agreed divorce decree. If there is an ambiguity, the agreement may be reformed to correct a mutual mistake or reflect the parties’ intent. An ambiguity exists if the meaning is uncertain or could reasonably be interpreted in more than one way. To show there was a mutual mistake, a party must prove there was a definite agreement that was misstated in the contract due to a mistake of both parties.

In a recent case, a wife moved for clarification to correct the trial court’s omission of the amount of her portion of the husband’s military retirement. The couple divorced in 2000. The agreed final divorce decree awarded the wife an amount of the husband’s Navy disposable retired pay, and 50% of all increases. The amount was supposed to be “determined under the formula set forth below,” but the decree did not contain a provision setting forth a specific portion or calculation. The decree awarded` the portion of the retirement pay “not awarded to [the wife]” to the husband.

The husband started receiving his military retirement benefits in 2015. When the wife contacted the Defense Finance and Accounting Service to get her share of the benefits, she was told she could not be paid because the decree did not include a formula awarding her a portion of the retirement.

Dre Day: Without a prenuptial agreement, Dr. Dre and his wife, Nicole Young, might see their day in court

Published on: July 6, 2020 | by McClure Law Group

As a result of his illustrious career, Dr. Dre’s net worth currently sits at a whopping $820 million – but maybe not for long. After 24 years, Dr. Dre’s wife, Nicole Young, is filing for divorce from the producer, rapper, and hip-hop icon. Reports indicate that the couple did not execute a premarital agreement prior to their 1996 marriage, which opens up Dr. Dre to significant financial exposure. In the absence of a premarital agreement, California – a community property state much like Texas – provides that property accumulated during marriage is owned by the community estate. Put simply, all of Dr. Dre’s income during the marriage, from his royalties as a solo rapper to his profits from Beats by Dre, is up for grabs. This means that Dr. Dre could see his hard-earned fortune be split in half right before his eyes in the coming months. Continue Reading ›

Can my spouse kick me out of our house or keep me from moving out of our house?

Published on: June 26, 2020 | by McClure Law Group

Whether a celebrity or not, we all worry about many of the same core issues when facing a divorce – How do I protect my stuff (money, investments, real property, personal property) and how do I protect the kids.

Divorce in Texas after a Pandemic: What to Know

Published on: June 24, 2020 | by Jackson Olesky

As states begin to emerge from months of lockdown resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, will there be an increase in divorce filings? This question is of particular interest in Texas, where state and local officials have started the process of easing quarantine restrictions. However, with much uncertainty as to the pandemic in the months ahead, the answer to this question remains unclear at the moment. So, should a potential increase in divorce filings effect your decision-making regarding your own divorce? Perhaps, an even more important consideration is not how many divorces there will be, but rather how filing for divorce changed since the pandemic began. Continue Reading ›

Texas Appeals Court Upholds Order Requiring Father to Pay Mother’s Attorney’s Fees

Published on: June 15, 2020 | by McClure Law Group

When a party wants a judgment corrected, he or she generally has to challenge it directly within a specific time frame. In some cases, however, a person may seek to avoid the effect of the judgment through a collateral attack. A voidable judgment becomes final unless it is attacked directly in accordance with applicable procedural rules, but a void judgment may be challenged at any time. In a recent case, a Texas appeals court had to determine if a provision in a Texas divorce decree ordering a father to pay the mother’s attorney’s fees was void or voidable.

The divorce decree included a fee provision that ordered the father to pay the mother’s attorney’s fees related “to issues concerning the suit affecting parent-child relationship [“SAPCR”] and the safety and welfare of the children.”

The father moved to modify the decree about a month after it was signed. He asked for increased possession and decreased child support. He also challenged the fee provision. The court’s order increased his possession. In its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the court found there was not a sufficient change in circumstances of either parent or the children to support a change in the father’s child support obligations or the fee provision. The court ordered him to continue to pay all of the mother’s attorney’s fees related to the SAPCR.

Texas Court Did Not Acknowledge Mexican Divorce Due to Procedural Issues

Published on: May 28, 2020 | by McClure Law Group

Divorce can be complicated when the parties are citizens of different countries. Each party may feel a divorce in the other’s country may be unfair to them. There may be issues regarding jurisdiction. Furthermore, even after one country issues a divorce, the other country may not recognize it. A husband recently challenged a Texas divorce after a Mexican court had already granted a divorce.

The parties married in 1986 in Texas. The husband is a Mexican citizen and the wife is a U.S. Citizen. They had residences in both countries during their marriage. Their business was in Mexico, but the wife and daughter lived in Texas at the time of the Texas divorce proceedings.

The husband filed for divorce in Mexico in 2015. The wife challenged jurisdiction, arguing jurisdiction was in Texas because that is where the parties lived. The Mexican court granted the divorce in April 2016.

Collaborative Law: Creative Solutions for an Unprecedented Time

Published on: May 18, 2020 | by Francesca Blackard

Although courts are still open and conducting Zoom hearings, there is no doubt that many court cases are moving along more slowly than otherwise desired as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. A potentially more practical and expedient method of divorce is collaborative law. Continue Reading ›

Texas Court Denies New Qualified Domestic Relations Order More Than 20 Years After Divorce

Published on: March 4, 2020 | by Francesca Blackard

A court generally may not amend or change the property division made in a Texas divorce decree. The court may issue an order to enforce the property division, but such an order may only clarify the prior order or assist in its implementation. If a court improperly amends or modifies the substantive property division in the final divorce decree, it is acting beyond its power and that order is unenforceable. Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 9.007. Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDRO) are separate orders that set forth the distribution of retirement plan assets. They are considered a type of enforcement or clarification order and cannot change the property division made in the divorce decree.

In a recent case, an ex-wife sought an additional QDRO years after the divorce was finalized. The couple divorced in 1995, and the parties have been in litigation for the past several years regarding the husband’s retirement accounts.

The divorce decree awarded the ex-wife 50% “of any and all sums … related to any … retirement plan, pension plan, … or other benefit program existing by reason of [ex-husband’s] past, present, or future employment, including without limitation, [ex-husband’s] Retirement Fund, Provident Fund, and SPIF Fund with Shell Oil Company per Qualified Domestic Relations Orders …” The trial court signed a QDRO awarding the ex-wife half the funds in the ex-husband’s Shell Provident Fund on the date of the divorce. The court found the total community property interest in the Shell Provident Fund was the total amount of contributions, interest, and earnings made or accrued by or on behalf of the ex-husband into any of the Shell Provident Fund accounts. The QDRO stated the ex-wife was “divested of all right, title, and interest in and to any balance remaining in any account of the Shell Provident Fund…” and that the fund would be discharged from all obligations to her when full payment was made pursuant to the QDRO. It also said it would become an integral part of the divorce decree.